Infant mortality
Nicholas Kristof writes:
If it's shameful that we have bloated corpses on New Orleans streets, it's even more disgraceful that the infant mortality rate in America's capital is twice as high as in China's capital. That's right - the number of babies who died before their first birthdays amounted to 11.5 per thousand live births in 2002 in Washington, compared with 4.6 in Beijing.
While I share Kristof's outrage at the Bush Administration's disgraceful response to the disaster in New Orleans and his concern about the poor in America, I wonder about this figure. I suspect that when health authorities in Beijing calculate infant mortality rates, they are looking at infants born to registered residents of Beijing. I believe there are something like 3 million migrant workers in Beijing whose childern are not counted. Since these workers basically have no access to health care, the real infant mortality rate is likely to be much higher.
Tuesday, September 06, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Not only that, but many nations define "born" in special ways, as I read many years ago. Some countries it doesn't get counted unless the baby survives 24 hours. Premature babies don't get counted either. This brings up another issue: that the higher tech of the US enables us to take riskier cases, with correspondingly higher death rates. I suspect if you matched cases demographically by income, social and educational factors, etc, the difference would disappear.
Michael
Post a Comment